DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.2.1874

Bird diversity of the Amrutganga Valley, Kedarnath, Uttarakhand, India with an emphasis on the elevational distribution of species

Soham Dixit, Viral Joshi, Sahas Barve

Abstract


A unique aspect of montane birds is the elevational stratification they show in their distribution, but in the Himalayas, a subset of the species show elevational migration, making bird communities on these mountains especially dynamic. Thus, understanding the elevational distribution and movement of species across seasons is important to fully understand broad-scale community patterns. In this study, we compile a comprehensive checklist of birds along a 2,300 m Hima­layan elevational gradient in the Amrutganga Valley, Kedarnath Wildlife Division, Uttarakhand, India. We recorded 244 species including 34 species new for the area and two new species for the state. Most importantly, we describe the elevational distribution of more than a 200 species and the dates of first sighting for several summer migrants in the season. We also studied changes in species richness and turnover at multiple elevations across seasons. We hope that this study provides a baseline for future research on elevational distribution of birds in the Western Himalayas. 


Keywords


Western Himalayas; Avifauna; Kedarnath; elevational migration; elevational distribution

Full Text:

PDF/A

References


Barthlott, W., W. Lauer and A. Placke. 1996. Global distribution of species diversity on vascular plants: towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50: 317–327.

Conservation India. (2015). Eurasian Woodcock, Kedarnath, Ut­tar­akhand. Accessed at http://conservationindia.org/gallery/eurasian-woodcock-kedarnath-uttarakhand/, 29 November 2015.

Freeman, B.G. and A.M.C. Freeman. 2014. Rapid upslope shifts in New Guinean birds illustrate strong distributional responses of tropical montane species to global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(12): 4490–4494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318190111

Graham, C.H., A.C. Carnaval, C.D. Cadena, K.R. Zamudio, T.E. Roberts, J.L. Parra, C.M. McCain, R.C.K. Bowie, C. Mortiz, S.B. Baines, C.J. Schnider, J. VanDerWal, C. Rahbek, C.H. Kozak and N.J. Sanders. 2014. The origin and maintenance of montane diversity: integrating evolutionary and ecological processes. Ecography 37(8): 711–719. doi: 10.1111/ecog.00578

Grimmett, R., C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp and R. Allen. 2011. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. London: Christopher Helm.480 pp.

Hedlund, J. 2015. Climate change effects on migratory birds and on the ecology and behaviour of the willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus) [Ph.D. thesis]. Stockholm: Stockholm University. 121 pp. http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A852581

Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: a critical review. The Auk 118(2): 557–562. doi: 10.1642/0004- 8038(2001)118[0557:HSSIAE]2.0.CO;2

Koparde, P. and S.Manchi,2013. Avifaunal records from Chalis Ek, North Andaman Island: insights into distribution of some Andaman Island birds. Check List 9(1): 34–41. doi: 10.15560/9.1.34

McCain, C.M. 2009. Global analysis of bird elevational diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18(3): 346–360. doi: 10.1111/ j.1466-8238.2008.00443.x

Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. Da Fonseca and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(24): 853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501

Olson, D.M. and E. Dinerstein. 2002. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89(2): 199–224

Olson, D.M., E. Dinerstein, E.D. Wikramanayke, N.D. Burgess, G.V.N. Powell, E.C. Underwood, J.A. D›amico,I. Itoua, H.E. Strand, J.C. Morrison, C.J. Loucks, T.A. Allnutt, T.H. Ricketts, Y. Kura, J.F. Lamoreux, W.W. Wetengel, P. Hedao and K.R. Kassem. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51(11): 993–1038. doi: 10.1641/ 0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2

Pandit, M.K. and V. Kumar. 2013. Land-use change and conservation challenges in the Indian Himalaya; pp. 123–133, in: P.H. Raven, N. S. Sodhi and L. Gibson (eds.). Conservation biology: voices from the tropics. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118679838.ch15

Price, T.D., D. Mohan, D.T. Tietze, D.M. Hooper, C.D.L. Orme and P.C. Rasmussen. 2011. Determinants of northerly range limits along the Himalayan bird diversity gradient. American Naturalist 178(4): 97–108. doi: 10.1086/661926

Sekercioglu, C.H., S.H. Schneider, J.P. Fay and S.R. Loarie. 2008. Climate change, elevational range shifts, and bird extinctions. Conservation Biology 22(1): 140–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00852.x

Shenoy, S. 2014. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance. eBird, Ithaca, New York. Accessed at http://www.ebird.org, 29 September 2015.

Singh, A.P. 2003. Delhibird — The Northern India Bird Network. Acces­sed at http://www.delhibird.com/Checklists/Kedarnath.html, 15 December 2015.

Somveille, M., A. Manica, S.H.M. Butchart and A.S.L. Rodrigues. 2013. Mapping global diversity patterns for migratory birds. PLoS One 8(8): e70907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070907

Suryawanshi, K. 2014. eBird: An online database of bird distribution and abundance. eBird, Ithaca, New York. Accessed at http://www.ebird.org, 29 Spetember 2015 .

Uttaranchal.org. (2015). Uttarakhand. Retrieved 23 November 2015, from http://www.uttaranchal.org/uttarakhand.html